Write a summary of the following passage in one-third of its length: The slogan of 'freedom of expression' is very prevalent today. Whether it is an artist, writer, television medium or journalist, all seem to chant the refrain of freedom of expression. But the irony is that those who loudly advocate freedom of expression are the very ones who are seen blatantly misusing it. The Constitution has granted the right to freedom of expression. Every individual is free to express his views; likewise, the other side is also free to voice its opposition. Such freedom must exist in a democracy. However, it must also be kept in mind that just as we have the freedom to say what we want, so too does the other person have the freedom to present his point of view. Even if we do not agree with the other side, we should at least have the courage to listen. In our country, 'freedom of expression' is used not as a right but as a weapon. Those who raise slogans want freedom of expression for themselves to say what they wish, but they do not want to allow those with opposite views to speak. In fact, such people do not want freedom of expression; they want unrestrained licence in the name of rights.